Quote of the Day

July 13th, 2010

“Remember: you’re better than a lot of people now.”

In the immortal words of Moby: Sunday was a bright day

March 7th, 2010

In our culture of multitasking and attention deficit, most people are unable to stay on one task, unable to focus. With the information overload that is so prominent nowadays, this ability to multitask is desirable and sometimes even essential to success. I fear I might fall on the unhealthy end of this spectrum. I get quickly and incredibly bored when trying to perform a single action: I have to have several things going on at once. Music, Facebook, Google reader, all these things have to be on my desktop while I work and, believe it or not, when all these distractions are readily available at my fingertips, I find myself to be significantly more productive. But of all my distractions, my beloved TV never gets old. Of my rather expansive movie collection, I have several titles that I find myself turning to on a regular basis, as distractions, background noise or whatever you want to call it. I’ll spend a few minutes considering my options and, almost as a rule, I’ll grab something like Waiting…, Just Friends, Idiocracy or some other B.S. disposable movie that I know inside and out to keep me company while I make lunch or do laundry.

But of all these B.S. disposable movies, The Core is my best friend. The Core holds a warm place in my heart unlike any of the other end-of-the-world flicks, and I’m unsure why: It is, for all intents and purposes, a horrible movie that makes no sense at all on so many levels (I won’t get into the plot holes or questionable physics of this glorified B movie at this point, since that would really frak up the flow that I’ve got going). I do not get the impression that it set out to be a campy B-movie but that might be the best way to describe it. My fascination with this film is further confounded because other movies that take themselves too seriously end up only enhancing their own cheesieness (while here it seems to add to its appeal). I’m not defending the movie, contesting the fact that (as far as cinematic adventures are concerned) this particular one kind of blows, or even saying I like it, I am simply stating that I am inexplicably drawn to in on some mysterious level by some trickster of a movie deity.

On this particular viewing (as of this writing, it is currently paused at 48 minutes, about the time when Rome blows up) I noticed that it has something that is very out of place with the rest of the film: it has character. Each of the protagonists are fun, and they develop throughout the movie, and as a result of the events in the movie. I feel confident in saying that these are well written, well rounded, individuals, but the setting they were dropped into was not.

That having been said, I’m going to work on WordPress themes while I watch the world get saved again, since these two activities are not mutually exclusive. And then its off to work in Summerville. Ciao.

Musical accompaniment: Moby – Sunday or The Cranberries – Sunday

Immersed in thought on the drive to work.

February 15th, 2010

Apparently, I’m getting old because even shit songs by crap artists that I renounced in my youth make me happy when I hear them as I reminisce about “back in the day.”

Eleven

February 5th, 2010

I’m concerned about the state of the universe: news says an eleven (11, not ‘elven’) year old girl just squeezed out a kid. Eleven. When I was that age I was watching cartoons and playing LEGOs, nervously clutching my littlest brosef (shout-out to Daniel!) who had just been born. At the risk of sounding mean and inconsiderate, I’m sure that kid will be a well-adjusted and productive member of society, and the mother will be a nurturing and successful child, mother, young adult and adult. I’m also confident that they will both prove to be self-sufficient citizens.

Perhaps another death star or sith lord needs to be destroyed to return balance to the Force.

[steps off soap box]

… and in conclusion: ELEVEN!

Do as I say, not as I do…

December 7th, 2009

Not too long ago, I was a witness to an interesting encounter: the feeding of a nine year old boy. Thats right, I said nine; but that isn’t the part of the experience we will re-hash today.

I’m not sure how this came about, but an adult (an educated individual, who has a passion for and works with kids) started playing “airplane” with the wide assortment of foods on the aforementioned child’s plate. Everyone was having a blast: this was so much fun! And the kids were digging it because they were able to hang out with an awesome adult. Which leads me to my next point: kids imitate you. What you say, what you do, regardless of context, situation or appropiateness, they learn by example and want to be and act like the “cool” adults (and to them, we’re all cool). That being the case, this kid decided to feed the adult, swirling a full fork about in a manner reminiscent to an out-of-control aeroplane. It turns out this was inappropriate and unacceptable!

Adult power: engage!
Stern voice: activate!

The “I’m the adult; I’m in control” mindset was in full swing as the child was repremanded for doing what it was in his nature to do, for doing his thing.

I was confused and speechless at what was transpiring: an adult showed a kid a neat trick that everyone enjoyed, and he seriously didn’t expect the child to mimic him?! Or was this just a [subconscious and] deliberate attempt to set up a scenario where authority can be exercised?

Whatever the case may have been, I descreetly (at least I think it was descreet, since no one but the addressed heard) mentioned this observation in a non-threatening, non-accusing manner to the involved adult (a bit out if character for me, I know, but I wasn’t trying to make a point or loud anyone out, I was sincerly curious what this person was thinking). That didn’t work so well: how dare I question his handling of the situation? He works with kids and knows what he’s doing! Needless to say, I still don’t know what was going through his mind.

This incident has no real bearing on anything of any significance… scratch that: this is a person that teaches our youth? That having been said, I’m still not sure why this event has stuck with me all this time, or why I would personally take offense at it, but it has and I do…

Why the hell do I think of such random things?

November 11th, 2009

On my rather lengthy commute betwixt the ole office and homestead, my mind often wonders, taking me to strange and weird places. Come to think of it, my mind wonders all the time, not just whilst driving. This particular time, I found myself thinking about Serenity… the movie, not the pilot episode of Firefly, nor the space craft featured there-in, or the state of mind. Now, I have spent a lot of ‘me’ time reflecting over my love of movies, specifically my love of all movies. This introspection has led me to believe that I pass judgment on a movie immediately after seeing it, and hence, my judgment is more a reflection of my views of the experience, rather then the work itself. I leave the theater affected equally by the cinematic encounter and the motion picture. I spread the hype about how awesome this or that was, and when I spend my hard-earned money buying the DVD it just sits on my shelf, because I never watch it again… the experience is never the same, it can never live up to what I have built it up to be. It is for this reason I have recently been making a conscious effort to ’sit on’ a movie after watching it, to let the hype, majesty and mysticism wear off, so that I can make an unbiased, objective criticism. This can be a difficult ordeal: it was not easy to come to terms with the fact that the long-awaited sequel to one of my all-time favorite franchises (Indiana Jones) was complete rubbish.

The reason for the above lead-in is the parallel I mean to draw between Indy and Firefly: I love both franchises, I was delighted to hear that they were making sequels, I stood in line like everyone else to show my support in exchange for a bit of the experience. When one has so much invested in a thing, months, sometimes years of built up anticipation, tension and hope (all of which are very difficult for the movie makers to live up to), it is hard to allow oneself to dislike it. One sees it, gets excited about it and their memories focus on the excitement, not the plot, characters, story, cinematography etc. When this person finally allows him/herself to accept the fact that they do not, in fact, really care for the film, it can be a real downer. Such was the case today with Serenity.

I initially became interested in Firefly, the series when I saw commercials for it before it aired. At first, I was only interested in it for plot ideas for my Star Wars RPG campaign, which featured a similar collection of characters and archetypes. In the end, it was the characters that got (and kept) me hooked. There were enough primaries to provide writers with a wide pallet of story styles and types, but not so many that the viewer lost interest or got confused; Serenity [the ship] maintained a beautiful balance of relatability and variety. Once the series was watched in its ‘entirety’ (as much as a series that was taken off the air before a season was completed could be called ‘entire’), the viewer feels like they are part of a family, like they belong with the crew aboard Serenity [again, the ship, not the pilot, stat of mind or the movie]. This bond was such that I felt let down and somewhat abandoned every time I watched the series, since I felt there was so much wasted potential, so many loose ends, so many places this show could have gone, if only it had been given a chance. Needless to say, I was giddy when I heard a movie was to be made: at least they would wrap up some of the loose ends. Alas, it would not be so. I didn’t really think this particular investment through: the makers would be unable to make the movie the fans wanted, and the compromise they pawned off on use ended up being a disappointment as a conclusion to our belove’d series and as a stand alone movie.

The impetus for this tirade was something that had been nagging at me since the first time I saw Serenity [the movie, not the ship or pilot]: Mal and Simon/River’s relationship. A large subplot that tied a good bit of the original series together was Mal growing to accept the two as part of the crew, as part of his family. Mal had come a long way in the show from wanting to abandon them. The movie completely ignored this. In the movie, Mal had reverted to the Mal of several years earlier, where the relationships that they had built did not exist. A major plot point that ran throughout the entire series was ignored! I understand why they did it: they needed tension, drama and conflict, but to ignore the character development that had taken place in the series is to ignore the series itself! They re-invented the wheel in re-telling a story they had already covered, instead of focusing one one of the many opportunities the show had to offer (most of which were either ignored altogether or barely addressed). As above, I was super stoked to finally get to see the movie, so much so that I loved it, despite this (then) minor reservation. A reservation that has been festering and growing until I could no longer say that I love the movie, until the day when I realized I not only did not like the movie, I consider it a slap in the face of everything that the series built. I still find it incredibly cool that there was enough of a fan-base and following to talk Hollywood into making a motion picture out of a TV series that had been canceled after less then one season, but the whole experience feels kind of dirty and cheap, seeing as how we had to sell out to make it happen.

Points of interest

October 6th, 2009

Saying "real quick" after an hour long task does not make it any quicker, nor does it make the task APPEAR any quicker.

"We" is plural; as in "me AND you." Using this word when not including yourself is incorrect, improper and missleading. Even though it is intended to evoke team spirit, unity and solidarity, it fails in all of the above intentions when the person talking does not contribute. It feels more respectful and less condescending if you just say "you."

Saying "thank you for your patience" when the person has, had and will have no patience is condescending. It does not convince either party that anyone is or was patient.

Pledge of Allegiance Poll: “Should we omit ‘under God’ from the Pledge of Allegiance?”

August 24th, 2009

Not everyone believes in the same God, and by design, they do not have to. The founding fathers made it clear that you can be American and not necessarily be any specific religion. ‘Under God’ should not be necessary when swearing allegiance to America (which is a geo-political entity, not a religious one) if for no other reason then the alienation of those who do not believe in the Judeo-Christian teachings.

On a somewhat related note, of what relevance is the use of the bible for swearing in of people in court if the person does not hold that particular writing sacred? Some people might as well use Moby Dick or the SCDOT Driver’s Manual, that way everyone feels uncomfortable, not the poor atheist/Buddhist/pagan who is called upon to swear xy and z to a deity he or she does not believe in.

A good, solid Hungarian meal!

August 1st, 2009

I am tonight being treated to not only a deep and insightful analysis of the business of feeding the free word (a loathsome yet popularly supported industry) but also to a taste of some classic Hungarian cuisine. I am not denying the deliciousness of rendered pig fat (for it sure is tasty in a life expectancy reducing kind of way, pictured above), I just find its consumption a bit ironic after an extended criticism of the evils of corn, corn products and its content in our everyday foods. Corn free products are fairly easily accessible (I think they would be found near or around organic products), and their purchase would let the involved parties know that you as a consumer have no desire to purchase whipped cream with corn starch/syrup in it, but, alas, no such products have been actively searched out as a result of the cinematic screening which spurred this insightful, albeit one sided, discussion.

I have no doubt that there is a lot of cruel treatment of animals (however defined), unfair business and political practices, and perhaps even some rough labor issues, but the fact remains that we as consumers don’t want to know this. We’re just stoked that there is enough food (relatively speaking) to support our ever-growing numbers. Most people don’t want to know this because by knowing, they would feel obligated to do something about it, but that would require effort, and perhaps a closer look at us and our society. My wife and I were the laughing-stock of the residence when we gave up meat for a month, but it is reasonable to proclaim a minimized meat intake based on the conditions of the slaughter houses (as portrayed by the most-likely disgruntled farms that were denied the big four [?] contracts) while consuming a meal that involves two meats and two cheeses.

The above dinner conversation and subsequent observation were made possible by a recent viewing of Food, Inc., I guess now I have to watch it. Just as a hypothetical, what if I find the film disturbing in such a way as to boycott non-organic meats: will it be better received then the last time I gave up meat?

Sandor7 background