Not everyone believes in the same God, and by design, they do not have to. The founding fathers made it clear that you can be American and not necessarily be any specific religion. ‘Under God’ should not be necessary when swearing allegiance to America (which is a geo-political entity, not a religious one) if for no other reason then the alienation of those who do not believe in the Judeo-Christian teachings.

On a somewhat related note, of what relevance is the use of the bible for swearing in of people in court if the person does not hold that particular writing sacred? Some people might as well use Moby Dick or the SCDOT Driver’s Manual, that way everyone feels uncomfortable, not the poor atheist/Buddhist/pagan who is called upon to swear xy and z to a deity he or she does not believe in.

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Monday, August 24th, 2009 at 7:08 pm and is filed under religion, social. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One comment

 1 

On a related note, many people don't realize that "under God" was not an original part of the Pledge. It was written in 1892 by a Baptist minister named Francis Bellamy. Bellamy's original Pledge read, "I Pledge Allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."

The phrase "under God" was not added until 1954. So the Baptist minister that wrote the original version of the Pledge didn't feel it necessary to include it. George Docherty, the minister where Eisenhower worshiped, made the suggestion in a sermon to keep it from being a "hollow verse taught to children for memory."

Seems to me that when someone recites the Pledge, it's either sincere or not. Adding or removing "under God" will not make your feelings any more or less sincere.

August 29th, 2009 at 5:51 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

Switch to our mobile site