Permalinks

May 1st, 2010

YAY! We have permalinks… links that make sense instead of random post IDs.

Talk amongst yourselves:

March 25th, 2010

I propose to you that the wolf-man myth is an allegory (yeah, you like that one? Its my fifty cent word of the day) to teach us ignorant men-folk of the female condition.

So check it out: this (traditionally) male individually is finely attuned to the lunar cycle; their biology and body chemistry change drastically for a brief period of time every twenty-eight or so days (at least in the original lore when the transformation was involuntary and controlled by the phase of the moon rather then the will of the affected individual). I guess the specific application of this mythos would determine whether this transformation is meant to illicit a sense of fear or terror from the viewer or one of compassion, sorrow and awe.

I’d be a horrible prostitute, because I can’t sell myself (or, Saturday, part II)

February 27th, 2010

I hate job interviews, so much so that I actively do my best to minimize how often I have to participate in them [editor's note: Dear BBY, I am comfortable in my role as SWAT at 1120 and am NOT, and have NOT been seeking employment elsewhere! I am not wanting this post or its opening to get passed around as a rumor. Please read on for content which will put this opening into perspective...]. I am at a crossroads in my life (have I mentioned my hatred for and dread of change?) having just concluded schooling, round two. The resultant degree makes me happy and leaves me with an amazing feeling of accomplishment and pride, as well as a substantial amount of debt to repay.

When taking note of my aforementioned phobia, it becomes clear that I need to transition from my current role of ‘knuckle-dragger’ to that of ‘web designer’ at my own pace, but that the previously mentioned moneys must still be re-paid. I currently have a great job, where I work with (and for) some amazing people, earn an honest wage, keep GREAT hours, and am given great benefits, and all this while working for a great company where I really feel valued and taken care of (this is not b.s., or one of my trademarked sarcastic tirades: I really do have a great job, despite my occasional bitching). Phobia or not, I plan on keeping my current job for a long while to come. These two factors (debt and existing job) make a few things clear: first, I need to find additional income, enough at least to cover the additional expense of tuition; second, I need to do this on my own time, so as to not interfere with what is still my primary source of income. I am left with one clear course of action: freelance work. This course certainly has both advantages and disadvantages. On an up note, I am able to gain valuable experience, build my portfolio and get involved in all kinds of cool projects. On the down side, I have to find work. I’ll repeat the title: I can’t sell myself. You can know everything about how to interview well, having read articles, research tips and watched videos, but that doesn’t change the fact that you have to sell yourself. And don’t be fooled, meeting with clients is an interview (reference first line: see, its all coming together), regardless of what one might label it as.

The only reason I’m going off on this rant is because for the better part of the morning I was doing everything in my power (including a shave and a haircut, see post I from today) to take my mind off the fact that I had a meeting early in the afternoon with a client. None of my distractions worked: I had a crap-tastic headache and felt like vomiting all day. I felt unprepared and inadequate during the meeting, second guessing myself and my skill level before and after. My first official meeting with a client in a web developer capacity having ended (whether it ended well or not is a matter of perception), and it being one of the hardest things I’ve had to do in a while, I’ll chalk this day up as a win and write the rest of the night off as ‘me time’… or rather, ‘me and beer time’.

How to cut your own hair (or, Saturday, part I)

February 27th, 2010

First and foremost: don’t.

In all fairness, that’s really a broad generalization; one must weigh all of the pros and cons before embarking on this particular journey of self-exploration (its a hair-cut – get your mind out of the gutter). I’ve never cared for hair cuts, probably because a) they never turn out the way I want them to (poor communication skills on my part and/or poor skill of the barber/stylist/whatever they call themselves) and b) I have such damned gorgeous hair (I’m not boasting: this is a quantifiable fact, I’ve measured it and done studies). Getting one’s hair cut professionally is a lot like Russian roulette (unless you get cut on regularly enough to have a preferred barber): you could be very satisfied after spending a bunch of money, or you might have to wear a hat for several weeks after spending a bunch of money. Conversely, its an in and out process with little clean-up and fuss. On the other hand, cutting it yourself will offer you… actually, I can think of no benefits to exponentially increasing the risk of a hair faux pas. Quite frankly, its kind of a pain in the ass, but when you absolutely, positively need to get a hair cut right the frak now, its the only way to. And when it turns out all right in the end, you’re left with an amazing sense of accomplishment that you will never ever get elsewhere: a hair cut you can really be proud of.

In conclusion: this really wasn’t a ‘how to’ article (the title just sounded catchy and cool), and I kind of trailed off midway, making it incredibly anticlimactic, but perhaps ‘Saturday, part II‘ will explain my lack of follow-through.

A spectacularly simple and breathtaking film

February 23rd, 2010

Source: darkroastedblend.com

Immersed in thought on the drive to work.

February 15th, 2010

Apparently, I’m getting old because even shit songs by crap artists that I renounced in my youth make me happy when I hear them as I reminisce about “back in the day.”

Do as I say, not as I do…

December 7th, 2009

Not too long ago, I was a witness to an interesting encounter: the feeding of a nine year old boy. Thats right, I said nine; but that isn’t the part of the experience we will re-hash today.

I’m not sure how this came about, but an adult (an educated individual, who has a passion for and works with kids) started playing “airplane” with the wide assortment of foods on the aforementioned child’s plate. Everyone was having a blast: this was so much fun! And the kids were digging it because they were able to hang out with an awesome adult. Which leads me to my next point: kids imitate you. What you say, what you do, regardless of context, situation or appropiateness, they learn by example and want to be and act like the “cool” adults (and to them, we’re all cool). That being the case, this kid decided to feed the adult, swirling a full fork about in a manner reminiscent to an out-of-control aeroplane. It turns out this was inappropriate and unacceptable!

Adult power: engage!
Stern voice: activate!

The “I’m the adult; I’m in control” mindset was in full swing as the child was repremanded for doing what it was in his nature to do, for doing his thing.

I was confused and speechless at what was transpiring: an adult showed a kid a neat trick that everyone enjoyed, and he seriously didn’t expect the child to mimic him?! Or was this just a [subconscious and] deliberate attempt to set up a scenario where authority can be exercised?

Whatever the case may have been, I descreetly (at least I think it was descreet, since no one but the addressed heard) mentioned this observation in a non-threatening, non-accusing manner to the involved adult (a bit out if character for me, I know, but I wasn’t trying to make a point or loud anyone out, I was sincerly curious what this person was thinking). That didn’t work so well: how dare I question his handling of the situation? He works with kids and knows what he’s doing! Needless to say, I still don’t know what was going through his mind.

This incident has no real bearing on anything of any significance… scratch that: this is a person that teaches our youth? That having been said, I’m still not sure why this event has stuck with me all this time, or why I would personally take offense at it, but it has and I do…

Why the hell do I think of such random things?

November 11th, 2009

On my rather lengthy commute betwixt the ole office and homestead, my mind often wonders, taking me to strange and weird places. Come to think of it, my mind wonders all the time, not just whilst driving. This particular time, I found myself thinking about Serenity… the movie, not the pilot episode of Firefly, nor the space craft featured there-in, or the state of mind. Now, I have spent a lot of ‘me’ time reflecting over my love of movies, specifically my love of all movies. This introspection has led me to believe that I pass judgment on a movie immediately after seeing it, and hence, my judgment is more a reflection of my views of the experience, rather then the work itself. I leave the theater affected equally by the cinematic encounter and the motion picture. I spread the hype about how awesome this or that was, and when I spend my hard-earned money buying the DVD it just sits on my shelf, because I never watch it again… the experience is never the same, it can never live up to what I have built it up to be. It is for this reason I have recently been making a conscious effort to ’sit on’ a movie after watching it, to let the hype, majesty and mysticism wear off, so that I can make an unbiased, objective criticism. This can be a difficult ordeal: it was not easy to come to terms with the fact that the long-awaited sequel to one of my all-time favorite franchises (Indiana Jones) was complete rubbish.

The reason for the above lead-in is the parallel I mean to draw between Indy and Firefly: I love both franchises, I was delighted to hear that they were making sequels, I stood in line like everyone else to show my support in exchange for a bit of the experience. When one has so much invested in a thing, months, sometimes years of built up anticipation, tension and hope (all of which are very difficult for the movie makers to live up to), it is hard to allow oneself to dislike it. One sees it, gets excited about it and their memories focus on the excitement, not the plot, characters, story, cinematography etc. When this person finally allows him/herself to accept the fact that they do not, in fact, really care for the film, it can be a real downer. Such was the case today with Serenity.

I initially became interested in Firefly, the series when I saw commercials for it before it aired. At first, I was only interested in it for plot ideas for my Star Wars RPG campaign, which featured a similar collection of characters and archetypes. In the end, it was the characters that got (and kept) me hooked. There were enough primaries to provide writers with a wide pallet of story styles and types, but not so many that the viewer lost interest or got confused; Serenity [the ship] maintained a beautiful balance of relatability and variety. Once the series was watched in its ‘entirety’ (as much as a series that was taken off the air before a season was completed could be called ‘entire’), the viewer feels like they are part of a family, like they belong with the crew aboard Serenity [again, the ship, not the pilot, stat of mind or the movie]. This bond was such that I felt let down and somewhat abandoned every time I watched the series, since I felt there was so much wasted potential, so many loose ends, so many places this show could have gone, if only it had been given a chance. Needless to say, I was giddy when I heard a movie was to be made: at least they would wrap up some of the loose ends. Alas, it would not be so. I didn’t really think this particular investment through: the makers would be unable to make the movie the fans wanted, and the compromise they pawned off on use ended up being a disappointment as a conclusion to our belove’d series and as a stand alone movie.

The impetus for this tirade was something that had been nagging at me since the first time I saw Serenity [the movie, not the ship or pilot]: Mal and Simon/River’s relationship. A large subplot that tied a good bit of the original series together was Mal growing to accept the two as part of the crew, as part of his family. Mal had come a long way in the show from wanting to abandon them. The movie completely ignored this. In the movie, Mal had reverted to the Mal of several years earlier, where the relationships that they had built did not exist. A major plot point that ran throughout the entire series was ignored! I understand why they did it: they needed tension, drama and conflict, but to ignore the character development that had taken place in the series is to ignore the series itself! They re-invented the wheel in re-telling a story they had already covered, instead of focusing one one of the many opportunities the show had to offer (most of which were either ignored altogether or barely addressed). As above, I was super stoked to finally get to see the movie, so much so that I loved it, despite this (then) minor reservation. A reservation that has been festering and growing until I could no longer say that I love the movie, until the day when I realized I not only did not like the movie, I consider it a slap in the face of everything that the series built. I still find it incredibly cool that there was enough of a fan-base and following to talk Hollywood into making a motion picture out of a TV series that had been canceled after less then one season, but the whole experience feels kind of dirty and cheap, seeing as how we had to sell out to make it happen.

my real quick Deapool kick

October 7th, 2009

not sure where this one is from

I do believe that is a Leon, the Professional poster in the background

Points of interest

October 6th, 2009

Saying "real quick" after an hour long task does not make it any quicker, nor does it make the task APPEAR any quicker.

"We" is plural; as in "me AND you." Using this word when not including yourself is incorrect, improper and missleading. Even though it is intended to evoke team spirit, unity and solidarity, it fails in all of the above intentions when the person talking does not contribute. It feels more respectful and less condescending if you just say "you."

Saying "thank you for your patience" when the person has, had and will have no patience is condescending. It does not convince either party that anyone is or was patient.

Sandor7 background